RECENT COMMENTS
Planning Commission to consider Richmond Riverfront Plan on Monday
A message yesterday from the Friends of Libby Hill:
Dear Friends of the View,
TAKE ACTION! NOW IS THE TIME TO HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE RICHMOND RIVERFRONT PLAN.
This coming Monday, August 20, 1:30 at City Hall, 5th floor the Planning Commission will have a working session on the new Riverfront Plan. (No public comment)
Action #1 If you can, come and be seen
Action #2 Take the time NOW to send an email
Names & email addresses are at the bottom of this notice. Please change name at bottom & add yours as contact for questions when forwarding this email to friends.Request that they amend the designation of USP (aka Echo Harbor) property to ‘public park’ as per the Downtown Master Plan, not ‘private property’
Below is a synopsis to bring you up to date. Use points you like or keep it short. Get something out to the full PC to show we are paying attention!
The proposed Richmond Riverfront Plan is full of exciting ideas. Overall, it creates a wonderful vision that seeks to balance natural areas, recreation sites and parkland with commercial interests, economic development and tourism. Exciting changes include the conversion of Mayo Island into a park, recreation fields on Chapel Island, pedestrian bridges across the river, and Manchester and Canal area development!
OUR CONCERN:
In one glaring exception to the general sensitivity of the plan, the USP site (also known as Echo Harbour) below Libby Hill is shown as a Future Development Area.Throughout the two-year Downtown Master Plan process and during the recent Riverfront Plan hearings, citizens again and again voiced opposition to visual intrusions of the historic panoramic view of the James River from Libby Hill –
the view that named Richmond.The best use of the riverfront below Libby Hill is parkland, which would keep intact the entire panoramic view of the river from the bend in the east to the terminus of the slave trail in the west.
This view – downriver, upriver, and across the James to the Manchester Docks and Ancarrow’s Landing – captures the full sweep of our City’s — and Nation’s — history. History that includes the villages of indigenous Virginia people, the colonial founding of Rocketts, the Confederate Naval Academy and Shipyard, and the tragic, complex and ultimately uplifting history of the African-American journey from slavery to freedom.
Entrance to the City: Both proposals for a new Route 5 entrance into the City would create a bottleneck at Main and excessive traffic, not to mention the damage a four-lane highway would do to the rural nature of Eastern Henrico.
Within this vista, one can view the route of the slave trail and the subsequent route that President Lincoln traveled in 1865, and then gaze west toward Capitol Square and the Governor’s Mansion to consider that Virginia became the first state to elect an African-American Governor.
OUR REQUEST:
Amend the Richmond Riverfront Plan to change the designation of the Riverfront parcels below Libby Hill from Future Development to Future Park! Request that BOTH proposals for a new Route 5 entrance into the City be denied.Mark your calendars to attend the City Council meeting on Sept 24. Whether or not you are able to attend on Monday afternoon, please send your comments now to Planning Commission members, as follows:
Melvin Law, Chair: lawmanchem@yahoo.com
William M. Hutchins, Vice Chair: whutchins@tcva.com
Jane Ferrara (CAO rep): Jane.Ferrara@richmondgov.com
The Hon. Doug Conner (City Council rep): Doug.Conner@RichmondGov.com
Lynn McAteer: lynn.mcateer@betterhousingcoalition.org
Doug Cole: dcole@cite-design.com
Charles Wray Jr.: CWray@BCWH.com
Rodney M. Poole, Esq.: Rodney@thewiltonco.com
Amy L. Howard: Amy.Howard@richmond.edu
Dave Johannas: dave@johannasdesign.comNote: To send a message to all members of the Planning Commission, please cut and paste one of the following email blocks into a new message, i.e., do not merely forward this alert.
If your email program uses a semi-colon between addresses, use this block:
lawmanchem@yahoo.com; whutchins@tcva.com; Jane.Ferrara@richmondgov.com; Doug.Conner@RichmondGov.com; lynn.mcateer@betterhousingcoalition.org; dcole@cite-design.com; CWray@BCWH.com; Rodney@thewiltonco.com; Amy.Howard@richmond.edu;
dave@johannasdesign.comIf your email program uses a comma between addresses, use this block:
lawmanchem@yahoo.com, whutchins@tcva.com, Jane.Ferrara@richmondgov.com, Doug.Conner@RichmondGov.com, lynn.mcateer@betterhousingcoalition.org, dcole@cite-design.com, CWray@BCWH.com, Rodney@thewiltonco.com, Amy.Howard@richmond.edu,
dave@johannasdesign.comThank you in advance for your assistance.
If you have any questions, please contact Coqui at (804) 644-1347
Or MacMarion@aol.com.
[COMMENT DELETED]
Thanks! I sent an e-mail that is actually for the development. I hope everyone will express his or her honest opinion.
Some Church Hill residents fight back against condo development
http://wtvr.com/2012/08/19/church-hill-residents-fight-back-against-condo-developmen/
It has come to my attention that some people may have believed that I was being serious with my earlier comment. While I have been frustrated with Mr. Johannas’s choice to serve on a board that regulates an area that he actively practices in and find this unethical, it is entirely legal by Richmond’s screwed up policies. I have no evidence that David Johannas has ever solicited or accepted any bribes in order to allow something to pass CAR nor am I implying that he has broken any laws.
My comments were entirely in jest and I would hope most folks would recognize this as purely an attempt at comedy.
Alex, you could be accused of many things on the basis of your posts on CHPN, but having a sense of humour would not be among them.
Posting on a public forum statements that impugn a person’s professional integrity when you have no evidence? That’s not jesting, that’s libel.
If people started posting that you were responsible for all the flat tires would you shrug it off and think someone was just exhibiting their sparkling wit?
Why don’t you think about treating people the way you would like to be treated?
@5 – so you honestly thought that my post was a serious accusation? Really? You really need to work on your reading comprehension skills. If I seriously believed Johannas had broken any laws, I’d be taking it to the police not making cracks about it on here. I admit it was in poor taste to even joke about it though, hence the clarification.
John- feel free to delete the first post if you can.